D063F3
Network
active measure
🛣️ BGP Route Injection
Fake BGP routes leading to monitored honey-nets.
⚠ Active measure — legal review required
This technique acts on infrastructure you do not own. Depending on jurisdiction it may constitute unauthorised access or interference, and it cannot reliably distinguish a hostile actor from a misconfigured legitimate one. Documented for completeness; obtain legal sign-off before any deployment.
What it is
Announce fake internal BGP routes for non-existent network segments. Any traffic routed to these segments is inherently malicious (no legitimate traffic should ever go there). All traffic is captured and analyzed.
Implementation requirements
- BGP-capable router infrastructure
- Unused IP address blocks
- Full packet capture infrastructure on honey routes
- Careful coordination with network ops to avoid routing disruptions
- Safety: originate only prefixes your organisation holds, with matching RPKI ROAs and IRR route objects. Never announce a more-specific prefix of space you do not hold; that is a route hijack, not a decoy
- Safety: keep announcements internal (iBGP, or tagged no-export) unless your upstream providers have agreed in writing. Apply max-prefix limits and outbound prefix filters so a mistake cannot leak routes
- Legal: traffic drawn to a honey route can include third-party data. Agree retention, privacy and disclosure terms with counsel before deployment
- Rollback: withdraw the announcement. Rehearse the withdrawal, and confirm with your upstream providers how long it takes to propagate
- Upkeep: Keep RPKI and IRR records current and re-check prefix filters after every router change. Rehearse the withdrawal quarterly.
Technologies
Network
ATT&CK coverage 1
| Technique | Tactic | Status | Confidence | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1046 Network Service Discovery |
Discovery | confirmed | strong | T1 |
| ↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy | ||||
↳ Evidence (3 sources)
| ||||
Evidence
- MITRE Engage — adversary engagement matrix and ATT&CK mapping — MITRE 2022 standard
- The UCSD Network Telescope — CAIDA, UC San Diego practitioner
Research basis: Extension of DNS sinkholing research — "SoK: P2PWNED - Modeling and Evaluating the Resilience of Peer-to-Peer Botnets."