Deception/ Identity
D003F3 Identity

🔑 Honey User Account

Decoy user identities in IAM/Entra ID/Cloud Identity.

What it is

A decoy human identity that exists in the directory and can actually be authenticated against, which is what separates it from a purely inert decoy. It works as a password-spray and credential-stuffing tripwire: an attacker spraying the tenant will reach it because it looks like a real user, and no real person will ever sign in as it. The F3 rating reflects that it answers an authentication attempt rather than just sitting there.

Implementation requirements

Cost

Low. The directory object itself is free on AWS and GCP. On Entra ID a decoy user may consume a licence seat if you want it covered by the same sign-in and conditional-access policies as real users, which is usually worth doing — an account excluded from your policies behaves differently from a real one and is easier to fingerprint.

Indicative only. Cloud pricing and licensing change — check the provider's official pricing pages for current rates before you budget.

Technologies

AWSAzureGCP

ATT&CK coverage 27

TechniqueTacticStatusConfidenceTier
T1114
Email Collection
Collection theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (3 sources)

Reading a honey mailbox is recorded by MailItemsAccessed; no study shows honey mailboxes specifically.

T1110
Brute Force
Credential Access confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1110.003
Password Spraying
Credential Access confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1621
Multi-Factor Authentication Request Generation
Credential Access theoretical moderate T4
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

The MFA push is generated by a sign-in attempt on the honey identity, which shares its event with T1078.

T1556
Modify Authentication Process
Defense Impairment theoretical moderate T4
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

Changing a decoy identity-provider configuration is a logged control-plane change.

T1033
System Owner/User Discovery
Discovery theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the decoy fires at a later step of the attack
↳ Evidence (3 sources)

whoami/quser output is not logged per object; the honey user fires when someone later tries to use it.

T1069
Permission Groups Discovery
Discovery confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1069.002
Domain Groups
Discovery confirmed strong T1
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1087
Account Discovery
Discovery confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1087.002
Domain Account
Discovery confirmed strong T1
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1087.004
Cloud Account
Discovery theoretical moderate T1
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

Listing users does not name the decoy; reading it does.

T1531
Account Access Removal
Impact confirmed strong T4
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (3 sources)
T1078
Valid Accounts
Initial Access confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (5 sources)
T1078.001
Default Accounts
Initial Access theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

No source covers decoy default accounts specifically.

T1566
Phishing
Initial Access theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (3 sources)

Backed by D003/D055; D051 is re-homed to the ATT&CK v20 AI techniques in step 5.

T1566.001
Spearphishing Attachment
Initial Access theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1566.002
Spearphishing Link
Initial Access theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1566.004
Spearphishing Voice
Initial Access theoretical weak T1
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (1 source)

No source covers decoy phone numbers.

T1534
Internal Spearphishing
Lateral Movement theoretical moderate T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

Internal phishing that reaches a honey mailbox is recorded; no study shows it in practice.

T1078
Valid Accounts
Persistence confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (5 sources)
T1098
Account Manipulation
Persistence confirmed strong T3
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (3 sources)
T1098.005
Device Registration
Persistence theoretical weak T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (1 source)

No audit signal sourced for device registration on a decoy account.

T1556
Modify Authentication Process
Persistence theoretical moderate T4
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

Changing a decoy identity-provider configuration is a logged control-plane change.

T1556.006
Multi-Factor Authentication
Persistence confirmed strong T4
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)
T1671
Cloud Application Integration
Persistence theoretical moderate T3
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (2 sources)

Direct only when the attacker consents to, or adds credentials to, an existing decoy application; registering a new app touches no decoy.

T1078
Valid Accounts
Privilege Escalation confirmed strong T2
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (5 sources)
T1098
Account Manipulation
Privilege Escalation confirmed strong T3
↳ Detection point: the attack step itself touches the decoy
↳ Evidence (3 sources)

Evidence

Research basis: MITRE D3FEND D3-DUC. Juels and Rivest, "Honeywords: Making Password-Cracking Detectable" (ACM CCS 2013) and Wang, "Bernoulli Honeywords" (NDSS 2024) provide the peer-reviewed basis for detectable decoy credentials. Microsoft's 2024 identity-honeytoken guidance and the Azure-Sentinel HoneyTokens solution cover the cloud-directory form.